ArticleBMC nephrology2026
A case report on the effective and safe use of ravulizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome during pregnancy.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety of Ravulizumab Use in Pregnancy: Insights from a Global Pharmacovigilance Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtypical hemolytic uremic Syndrome (aHUS), a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), had a poor prognosis until the development of complement C5-inhibiting monoclonal antibodies, eculizumab and ravulizumab. While ravulizumab has shown effectiveness in treating postpartum TMA, data about its use during pregnancy remains lacking. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old woman with a history of aHUS was initially diagnosed in 2018 at the age of 27 after presenting with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring hemodialysis and plasma exchange. Kidney biopsy showed evidence of TMA, and genetic testing identified a pathogenic CD46 (MCP) variant, confirming complement-mediated aHUS. She achieved complete hematologic and renal recovery with eculizumab therapy and remained dialysis-independent thereafter. Eculizumab was continued until 2021, with brief interruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to intermittent drug shortages. Treatment was discontinued, and the patient remained clinically stable under close monitoring. In 2022, during routine follow-up, she was found to be pregnant without complications. The pregnancy was unplanned; however, she was closely monitored throughout early gestation with regular assessments of renal function, hematologic parameters, blood pressure, proteinuria, and complement activity. Prophylactic complement inhibition was not initiated during early pregnancy because eculizumab was unavailable, and she remained in remission during the first trimester. At 25 weeks’ gestation, she developed a relapse of aHUS characterized by vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, and AKI. Stool testing for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli was negative. Eculizumab was unavailable; thus, after informed consent, ravulizumab was initiated based on her body weight as per the manufacturer’s label: a loading dose of 2,700 mg on Day 1 and a maintenance dose of 3,300 mg on Day 14, and subsequently 3300 mg every eight weeks. The patient achieved rapid hematologic and renal recovery and had a spontaneous full-term vaginal delivery without maternal or neonatal complications. Both mother and child remained well after about four years of follow-up on ravulizumab.
conclusionThis case report highlights the potential role of ravulizumab in managing aHUS during pregnancy. Given the limited safety data, further studies are needed to guide its use in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.