ArticleBMC health services research2026
From vision to value: a mixed methods evaluation of patient-centered care in Saudi Arabian primary healthcare centers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transformation of Saudi Arabia’s healthcare system under Vision 2030 emphasizes the importance of primary healthcare (PHC) centers and patient-centered care (PCC). Despite national reforms, limited research has assessed the extent to which PHC practices have adopted PCC principles. This study evaluated the impact and current status of the implementation of PCC across PHC centers in the Eastern Health Cluster of Saudi Arabia using the Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment (PCMH-A) tool.
methodsA convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 59 PHC centers across three health networks using the PCMH-A tool, which evaluates the implementation of PCC across seven domains. Simultaneously, qualitative data were gathered through open-ended responses embedded in the tool and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s approach.
resultsPCMH-A scores indicated moderate PCC implementation across all networks. The highest performing domain was quality improvement strategy (mean = 7.48), while patient-centered interactions scored the lowest (mean = 5.08). Comparison across networks showed that Network C consistently outperformed the others, supported by its structured leadership approach, stronger team-based care practices, and active community engagement initiatives. The qualitative findings helped explain these results. The participants reported several barriers to PCC, including centralized governance, limited access to services, poor care coordination, and low patient engagement. They also noted strengths such as improvements driven by accreditation and the use of health technology. Many of the barriers—such as limited resources, cultural factors, and uneven policy implementation—contributed to differences in PCC performance across networks.
conclusionDespite promising initiatives, significant gaps remain in PCC delivery in Saudi PHC centers, particularly in access, continuity, and patient involvement. Policy efforts should focus on decentralizing authority, investing in digital integration, and promoting culturally responsive practices. Enhancing these areas is essential for achieving Vision 2030’s goals and building an equitable, person-centered healthcare system.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.