Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987580›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2026

The XGBoost Model Versus the Logistic Regression Model Created Based on Serum Markers in Predicting the Risk of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment Following Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Xiaofeng Yang, Xianwen Li, Yanfeng Wu, Qian Zhang, Juan Chen, Fengjiao Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xianwen LiSchool of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6666-3923
Yanfeng WuDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Juan ChenDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Fengjiao ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission 2021 Medical Research Project M2021064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute ischemic stroke is a major cause of cognitive dysfunction. Early identification of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is crucial for improving patient prognosis. While there has been extensive research on prognostic models for acute ischemic stroke, the selection of predictive factors remains heavily reliant on neuroimaging parameters. This study aims to create and compare the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and logistic regression (LR) models based on serum biomarkers for predicting the risk of PSCI following acute ischemic stroke.

methodsThe study enrolled 261 adult patients with acute ischemic stroke within 7 days of onset. Their baseline characteristics, serum markers, and scores anthe National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were collected. Cognitive function assessment was completed 3 months (±2 weeks) after stroke, with PSCI diagnosis based on a MoCA score < 26. Patients were randomly assigned to the training dataset (n = 183) and testing dataset (n = 78) in a ratio of 7:3. Significant features for predicting the risk of PSCI were selected via LassoCV in R. The accuracy, F1 score, Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured to assess the accuracy of the XGBoost and LR prediction models. Finally, the performance of the optimal prediction model was evaluated by SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) beeswarm and force plots.

resultsThe incidence of PSCI and other baseline characteristics were comparable between the training and testing datasets (all P > 0.05). Vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-Cad), NIHSS score, age, drink history, C-reactive protein (CRP), and education years were features associated with the risk of PSCI. The XGBoost model was superior in accuracy, F1 score and sensitivity in predicting the risk of PSCI than the LR model. Beeswarm and force plots displayed the excellent ability of the XGBoost model in predicting the risk of PSCI in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

conclusionBased on serum biomarkers, the XGBoost model can accurately predict the risk of PSCI in patients with acute ischemic stroke, with superior performance than the LR model, and may serve as a reliable tool for early identification to improve the diagnosis.From 261 acute ischemic stroke patients (training n = 183, testing n = 78), we collected demographic data, cognitive assessments, and serum indicators. LassoCV identified sensitive predictors including VE-Cad, NIHSS score, CRP, age, drinking history, and education years. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance over LR in predicting PSCI risk. SHAP analysis revealed how these variables influenced model predictions. Based on serum biomarkers, the XGBoost model accurately predicts PSCI risk and may serve as a reliable tool for early identification to improve diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionIschemic StrokeAgedBiomarkersBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisStrokeBiomarkersacute ischemic strokelogistic regressionpost‐stroke cognitive impairmentserum markersXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41987580
PMCPMC13084191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.