Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987902›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Comparative metagenomic analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal gut microbiome delineating the identification of prospective prognostic markers and probiotics to protect from diarrhea: a brief report.

Rituparna De, Suman Kanungo, Asish K Mukhopadhyay, Shanta Dutta

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rituparna DeDivision of Bacteriology, National Institute for Research in Bacterial Infections, Kolkata, India.
Suman KanungoDivision of Epidemiology, National Institute for Research in Bacterial Infections, Kolkata, India.
Asish K MukhopadhyayDivision of Bacteriology, National Institute for Research in Bacterial Infections, Kolkata, India.
Shanta DuttaDivision of Bacteriology, National Institute for Research in Bacterial Infections, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhea is a leading contributor of mortality globally. To mitigate its disease burden, improved prognosis and alternative therapeutic approaches must be deployed. A cross-sectional gut microbiome analysis of 23 non-diarrheal and 5 diarrheal fecal samples was conducted with the aim of meeting the WHO's GAPPD (Global Action Plan for Pneumonia and Diarrhea) goals. Hypothesis: Next-generation sequencing is a potent tool being increasingly used for epidemiological surveillance. It can help in the comparison of the structural diversity of the gut microbiome between diarrheal and non-diarrheal samples, thereby aiding in the identification of prospective prognostic and therapeutic candidates. Aim: The pilot study was designed to identify prospective taxa that were comparatively enriched in non-diarrheal samples and to predict gut microbial community interactions. Methodology: 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and subsequent analysis were undertaken for taxonomic profiling and abundance interpretation of OTUs. Results: Significant differences between the two groups with respect to structural composition was revealed. Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in the majority of the samples. The B/F ratio was consistently <1 in all diarrheal samples. A significant difference in the mean B/F ratio of the two groups was found. Proteobacteria was significantly more abundant in the diarrheal group. On the other hand, Prevotellaceae was the most abundant family in non-diarrheal samples and was suppressed significantly in diarrheal samples. Streptococcaceae was the most abundant family in 60% of diarrheal samples; where Streptococcaceae was suppressed, Bacteroideaceae and Nocardiaceae were the most abundant. In non-diarrheal samples, where Streptococcaceae was almost completely suppressed, Bifidobacteriaceae was the most abundant and significantly suppressed other families. A negative correlation was observed between Prevotellaceae and Bacteroideaceae in the non-diarrheal group. Conclusion: The OTUs associated with diarrheal dysbiosis can serve as prognostic markers. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the comparative analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal microbiome, distinctly addressing the gut microbiome dysbiosis from the context that can lead to the development of prognostic markers and probiotics to protect the endemic population from diarrhea and help in achieving Sustainable Development Goals 2 and 3.

Indexed as

BacteriaDiarrheaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomicsProbioticsCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialFecesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMetagenomePhylogenyPilot ProjectsPrognosisDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SdiarrheametagenomicmicrobiomePrevotella copriproteobacteriaProteus mirabilis

Identifiers

PMID41987902
PMCPMC13076582

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.