Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41988383›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

The role of platelet derivatives in regenerative medicine: biological foundations and translational perspectives.

Carlos Fernando Mourão, Gutemberg Gomes Alves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos Fernando MourãoDepartment of Clinical and Translational Research, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Gutemberg Gomes AlvesBiology Institute, Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet derivatives have become a central strategy in regenerative medicine due to their capacity to concentrate autologous signals that initiate and coordinate tissue repair. These materials function as transient regulators of the cellular microenvironment, shaping immune-stromal interactions, cell migration, differentiation programs, and extracellular matrix organization. However, terms such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) encompass an ecosystem of preparations with considerable variability in composition, physical form, and biological performance. This heterogeneity, driven by differences in centrifugation parameters, anticoagulants, activation methods, tube types, and patient characteristics, explains inconsistent results across studies and hinders evidence consolidation. This mini-review discusses platelet derivatives along three axes: (i) their biological foundations and functional differences at the cellular and tissue microenvironment level among product families (PRP, PRF, formulations with modified plasma fractions, and human platelet lysate); (ii) how preparation variables impact reproducibility and interpretation of evidence; and (iii) current trends toward standardization, including classification systems, minimum reporting checklists, and dose/potency frameworks such as DEPA (Dose, Efficiency, Purity, Activation). Practical elements for minimum reporting are outlined to reduce product bias and enable cross-study comparisons. Ultimately, aligning study design with biological mechanisms and clinical indications through rational outcome selection will be essential to evaluate platelet derivatives as contemporary regenerative interventions with defined products, measurable quality, and clinically significant outcomes.

Indexed as

dose deliveredhuman platelet lysateplatelet derivativesplatelet-rich fibrinplatelet-rich plasmaregenerative medicinestandardization

Identifiers

PMID41988383
PMCPMC13076266

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.