ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
The role of platelet derivatives in regenerative medicine: biological foundations and translational perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiogenic and Regenerative Potential of Plasma-Based and Plasma-Free Platelet Concentrates Obtained via Different Fractionation and Activation Methods.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Platelet Lysate-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet derivatives have become a central strategy in regenerative medicine due to their capacity to concentrate autologous signals that initiate and coordinate tissue repair. These materials function as transient regulators of the cellular microenvironment, shaping immune-stromal interactions, cell migration, differentiation programs, and extracellular matrix organization. However, terms such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) encompass an ecosystem of preparations with considerable variability in composition, physical form, and biological performance. This heterogeneity, driven by differences in centrifugation parameters, anticoagulants, activation methods, tube types, and patient characteristics, explains inconsistent results across studies and hinders evidence consolidation. This mini-review discusses platelet derivatives along three axes: (i) their biological foundations and functional differences at the cellular and tissue microenvironment level among product families (PRP, PRF, formulations with modified plasma fractions, and human platelet lysate); (ii) how preparation variables impact reproducibility and interpretation of evidence; and (iii) current trends toward standardization, including classification systems, minimum reporting checklists, and dose/potency frameworks such as DEPA (Dose, Efficiency, Purity, Activation). Practical elements for minimum reporting are outlined to reduce product bias and enable cross-study comparisons. Ultimately, aligning study design with biological mechanisms and clinical indications through rational outcome selection will be essential to evaluate platelet derivatives as contemporary regenerative interventions with defined products, measurable quality, and clinically significant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.