ArticlePloS one2026
Increased serum albumin corrected anion gap levels are associated with poor prognosis in sepsis-induced coagulopathy patients.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is associated with high mortality, and acid-base disturbances are common in critically ill patients with this condition. The anion gap (AG) is affected by serum albumin levels, suggesting that the albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) may serve as a more accurate prognostic marker. However, the relationship between ACAG and outcomes in SIC remains unclear.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database (2008-2019). Adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with SIC within 24 hours of ICU admission were enrolled. SIC was defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria combined with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. ACAG was calculated as: ACAG = AG + 2.5 × (4.4 - Albumin [g/dL]). The optimal cutoff value (17.7 mmol/L) was determined using X-tile software. The primary outcome was in-hospital 30-day all-cause mortality. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed. Subgroup and interaction analyses were conducted to assess effect modification by malignancy status.
resultsA total of 3,846 patients were included (mean age 64.8 years; 38.4% female). Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher ACAG levels than survivors (median [IQR]: 21.4 [18.5-24.8] vs. 17.6 [15.2-20.3] mmol/L, P < 0.001). KM analysis showed that high ACAG (≥17.7 mmol/L) was associated with significantly lower in-hospital 30-day survival (log-rank P < 0.001). In the time-dependent Cox model (adjusted for SOFA, SAPS II, and lactate), high ACAG was independently associated with increased mortality (HR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.88-4.91, P < 0.001). ACAG demonstrated superior discrimination compared to uncorrected AG (AUC: 0.633 vs. 0.620, DeLong test P < 0.001). Notably, a significant interaction was observed between ACAG and malignancy (P for interaction < 0.001), with ACAG showing stronger predictive value in non-malignant patients (HR = 3.60, P < 0.001) than in those with cancer (HR = 1.59, P = 0.477).
conclusionsElevated ACAG is independently associated with increased in-hospital 30-day mortality in SIC patients and outperforms uncorrected AG. Its calculation requires no additional cost or testing, making it a practical bedside risk stratification tool, particularly for non-malignant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.