ArticlePloS one2026
Beyond silos: Drivers and barriers to intersectoral collaboration in zoonotic disease surveillance and response in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Africa: Epidemiological Trends, Transmission Ecology, Hotspot Heterogeneity, and Preparedness Challenges-A Narrative Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Stakeholder identification and prioritization of barriers to One Health implementation in Ghana's zoonotic disease surveillance and response system: a sequential mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Surveillance without silos: a One Health data imperative for avian influenza in West Africa.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The One Health approach has gained global traction as a strategy to combat zoonotic diseases, which account for 60-75% of emerging infectious diseases. While effective surveillance requires intersectoral collaboration, challenges such as fragmented systems, resource constraints, and weak coordination hinder efforts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Ghana. This qualitative study explores the factors influencing collaboration in zoonotic disease surveillance and response at the operational level, providing insights to strengthen intersectoral collaboration and improve public health outcomes across human, animal and wildlife sectors. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we analyzed interviews with 66 professionals from the human, animal, and wildlife health sectors, all directly involved in zoonotic disease surveillance and response. The findings reveal individual factors (interpersonal relationships, personal initiative, motivations, professional hierarchy, shared interests) and structural factors (financial resources, workforce availability, the governance and organization of surveillance and response systems, institutional visibility, knowledge systems) that shape collaboration dynamics. Additionally, positive outcomes from past collaborations created reinforcing cycles that influenced future engagement. Participants shared expectations of improved efficiency, strengthened disease surveillance, and enhanced resource pooling from future collaboration. Despite the global push for intersectoral collaboration, operational-level challenges persist. While grounded in a Ghanaian context, the types of factors identified likely resonate across resource-limited settings, though their specific manifestations and relative importance may vary by context. These findings underscore the broader need for stronger governance, equitable partnerships, and realistic alignment of stakeholder expectations to foster sustainable One Health collaboration and enhance zoonotic disease surveillance globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.