Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41990196›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

SAFR: Enabling Fragment-Based Drug Discovery with a Synthetic Binding Pose Data Set.

Joan Cabot-March, Xavier Jalencas, Jordi Mestres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joan Cabot-MarchChemotargets SL, Parc Cientific de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 4 (TR-03), 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-2205-5693
Xavier JalencasChemotargets SL, Parc Cientific de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 4 (TR-03), 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-0855
Jordi MestresChemotargets SL, Parc Cientific de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 4 (TR-03), 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5202-4501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (FBDD) is a powerful strategy with a proven track record of generating potent bioactive small molecules from low-affinity chemical fragments. Computational approaches to FBDD are often limited by the availability of high-quality, structurally resolved data on fragment binding poses. To address this gap, we introduce the Structurally Augmented Fragment Repository (SAFR), a novel data set designed to support in silico FBDD. Initially, a set of 89,375 high-confident binding poses of bioactive molecules in public sources was obtained by applying a filtering protocol involving 2D ligand similarity and 3D ligand superposition against protein-bound ligand structures followed by scoring with protein-ligand docking and interaction features. Fragmentation of the bioactive ligands in their predicted binding poses resulted in a total of 818,385 fragment-protein interactions between 157,080 unique chemical fragments and environments from 1,142 distinct proteins. Of them, 270,155 are unique fragment-protein interactions, of which 237,284 (88%) are not represented in protein-bound ligands in the PDB. Case studies using SAFR for bioisosteric replacements and scaffold hopping are presented. SAFR is a useful resource to support fragment screening campaigns and hit-to-lead optimization. It is publicly available at https://zenodo.org/records/18229523.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesBinding SitesLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingLigandsProteinsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID41990196
PMCPMC13126625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.