ArticleNeurology2026
Characterizing Individuals Fulfilling Clinical Criteria for Limbic-Predominant Age-Related TDP-43 Encephalopathy in a Tertiary Memory Clinic.
Article in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesLimbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) is characterized by an amnestic- and limbic-predominant phenotype, which can mimic Alzheimer disease (AD). In a memory clinic cohort, we tested whether clinical criteria for LATE can detect a clinical profile of LATE that is distinct from AD.
methodsIn this retrospective examination of a longitudinal memory clinic cohort from the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, we included individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (aged >50 years). We classified individuals based on baseline data on cognition, atrophy, amyloid-status, and tau-status into Probable- and Possible-LATE, co-occurring LATE and AD (LATE-AD), and AD (without LATE). Next, we compared these groups on demographics, clinical features, cognition, and atrophy.
resultsOf 3,606 individuals (mean age at baseline 66 [SD 6], 49.2% female) available for classification, we classified 56 (1.6%) as Probable-LATE, 115 (3.2%) as Possible-LATE, 127 (3.5%) as LATE-AD, and 1,675 (46.5%) as AD. Individuals with Probable-LATE progressed slower than AD on mini-mental state examination (MMSE) (sβ [SE] = 0.12 [0.05], DISCUSSION: Using an operationalization of clinical criteria for LATE, 8.2% of participants with MCI or dementia from our tertiary memory clinic were classified as Possible-LATE, Probable-LATE, or LATE-AD. Probable-LATE was characterized by a milder disease course than AD, whereas LATE-AD was characterized by a more aggressive disease course. This underscores the value of the proposed clinical criteria in identifying individuals with suspected LATE, who have distinct clinical trajectories from AD. Our findings, therefore, support the use of these criteria to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in the memory clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.