Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991555›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Folded domains impose structural heterogeneity and attenuated dynamics in biomolecular condensates.

Liguo Wang, Siewert J Marrink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Condensates as Conformation Editors of Disordered Client Proteins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liguo WangGroningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2953-3973
Siewert J MarrinkGroningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.j.marrink@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8423-5277

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101053661 "COMP-O-CELL"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates are widely studied using simplified analogues formed by purified low complexity domains (LCDs) or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). However, the exclusion of folded domains fails to capture natural molecular complexity and limits their physiological relevance. Here, we performed molecular dynamics simulations to systematically investigate the internal structure of condensates formed by full-length multidomain proteins (MDPs) in comparison to IDR-only systems. In contrast to uniformly expanded conformations observed in IDR-only condensates during tens of microseconds simulation, MDP-based systems exhibit significant heterogeneity. The heterogeneous microenvironment imposed by folded domains results in component-specific coupling and a wide range of conformations sampled by the IDRs. Strikingly, residue interaction specificity remains conserved between the condensed and solution states, even in the presence of MDPs. Finally, both local and global dynamics are attenuated in MDP-based condensates, opposing the heterogeneous retardation and unperturbed local dynamics observed in IDR-only systems. Our findings propose folded domains to act as architectural keystones in natural condensates, and enrich our understanding of their internal structural and dynamic properties.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein DomainsProtein FoldingIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41991555
PMCPMC13272642

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.