ArticleScientific reports2026
Differential effect of antiseizure medications eslicarbazepine and carbamazepine on hippocampal synaptic transmission and plasticity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-seizure medication (ASM) is the most widely used treatment for patients with epilepsy (PWE). Despite the availability of multiple ASMs, about 30% of the patients become drug-resistant. Moreover, there are several cases of seizure aggravation and cognitive side effects associated with ASMs. Therefore, understanding how ASMs work is essential for improving epilepsy treatment. In this study, we investigated the effect of first-generation drug carbamazepine (CBZ) and third-generation drug eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) on neuronal excitability, synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal neurons using patch clamp and field recording experiments. We found that both ESL and CBZ reduced the neuronal excitability differently. ESL reduced the action potential amplitude but did not affect the firing frequency, whereas CBZ application not only reduced the amplitude but also led to a significant reduction in the firing frequency. ESL reduced the amplitude of both spontaneous EPSCs and IPSCs, but CBZ did not alter spontaneous synaptic activity. Further, ESL reduced the magnitude of LTP in Schaffer collateral CA1 synapses but CBZ did not alter LTP. LTD was also studied to understand the effect of the drugs on bidirectional plasticity. We found that both ESL and CBZ reduced LTD, but the impairment caused by ESL was stronger than that caused by CBZ. This study underlines the complexity of the mechanism of action of ASM and also highlights the need for further research to develop better targeted drugs for epilepsy treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.