ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026
Childhood adversity and gestational diabetes: examining the mediating effect of BMI and depression through interventional mediation analysis.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood adversity has been shown to increase the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), though the mechanisms through which the risk is increased have yet to be examined.
methodsWe used register data on all women born in Denmark and giving birth for the first time between 2004 and 2018, totalling 207,659 women. Interventional mediation analysis was used to estimate how two mechanistic pathways, depression and pre-pregnancy BMI, mediate the relationship between childhood adversity and GDM across five previously identified adversity trajectory groups.
results4779 women were diagnosed with GDM between 2004 and 2018, corresponding to a 2.3% absolute risk of GDM. Compared to those who experienced low adversity in childhood, we estimated that those who experienced early material deprivation could have a 0.12% [95% CI 0.10, 0.14] reduction in absolute GDM risk by intervening on BMI and equalising its distribution to that of mothers in the low adversity group. We found no evidence of a reduction in risk if depression were similarly intervened on. For those in the high levels of adversity group no evidence of mediation was found.
conclusionsIntervening on pre-pregnancy BMI might potentially reduce the risk of GDM for mothers in some of the adversity groups, whereas intervening on depression seems to have little impact. The findings suggest that high adversity likely increases the risk of GDM through alternative mechanisms than BMI or depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.