ReviewActa neuropathologica2026
Consensus statement on microglial and macrophage functions in gliomas.
Review in Acta neuropathologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- CD163 Dominance Within Macrophages/Microglia Reflects a Favorable Prognosis in Patients With Glioblastoma.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the glioblastoma microenvironment in heterotypic 3D spheroids: a multicellular model to study tumor-stromal crosstalk.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This international consensus statement synthesizes key findings on the complex roles of microglia and macrophages (tumor-associated microglia/macrophages or TAMs) in glioma progression and therapeutic resistance. Recent advances have highlighted the cellular, spatial, and temporal heterogeneity of TAMs, their functional plasticity, and the intricate interactions between TAMs, glioma stem cells, and the neuronal microenvironment, challenging the M1/M2 classification paradigm for TAMs in gliomas and other misconceptions. The statement emphasizes that glioma cells manipulate TAMs to suppress anti-tumor functions, while microglia-mediated modulation of neuron-glioma cell interactions promotes tumor progression. Furthermore, glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) reprogram microglia to support tumor progression, offering novel therapeutic targets. To advance research and develop more effective treatments, the statement advocates for precision therapies targeting specific TAM subsets or functions, the use of bioengineered EVs as a therapeutic approach, and a shift away from simplistic terminology like "M1/M2" and "neuroinflammation". Ultimately, this new understanding can support innovative strategies to modulate the tumor microenvironment, turning immunosuppression into immunostimulation and improving outcomes for patients with glioblastoma and other types of gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.