ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Women's experiences of navigating gestational diabetes in Denmark: a qualitative study of healthcare and self-care, with a focus on dietary education and delivery.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requires women to rapidly integrate new dietary self-care practices into everyday life during pregnancy. Dietary education is a central component of GDM management, and in Denmark it is often offered as a single dietitian session, either through individual counselling or group-based education. However, limited attention has been given to how women experience dietary education and their preferences regarding its timing, format, and continuity, and how these features influence their ability to engage in dietary self-care. This study explores women’s experiences with healthcare and self-care in GDM within a Danish context, focusing on dietary education and how its delivery influences women’s ability to manage their condition.
methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 women with GDM. Data were analysed abductively using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis framework.
resultsSix themes were identified: (1) timely information, (2) information sources, (3) support from healthcare professionals, (4) group education delivery, (5) unmet self-care needs, and (6) dietary challenges during the transition to insulin therapy. Women described the period following GDM diagnosis as particularly challenging, highlighting unmet needs for timely, concrete, and actionable dietary guidance. Many relied on informal networks, including family, friends, and online communities, to supplement formal healthcare information. While peer interaction was valued by some, group-based dietary education was often perceived as insufficiently tailored to individual needs. Inconsistencies in dietary advice across healthcare professionals, limited opportunities for dietary follow-up, and insufficient support during the transition to insulin therapy contributed to uncertainty and frustration in dietary self-care.
conclusionsThe study identifies important gaps in the delivery of dietary education for women with GDM in Denmark, extending existing knowledge by highlighting how timing, format, continuity, and interdisciplinary coordination shape self-care experiences. These findings underscore the need for earlier, more individualised, and better-coordinated dietary education, including support during key transition points such as insulin initiation. Addressing modifiable features of healthcare delivery may enhance self-care, reduce uncertainty, and improve health-related outcomes for women with GDM and their offspring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.