ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Integrative bioinformatic analysis identifies an extracellular matrix gene signature linked to muscle adaptation to endurance and resistance training.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle exhibits a remarkable adaptive capacity; endurance training enhances mitochondrial capacity, whereas resistance training improves mechanical strength. Despite these differences, both training impose repeated contractile and remodeling demands on skeletal muscle, suggesting a conserved transcriptional response that may underpin the muscle's capacity to endure long-term training. However, a systematic analysis of the universal gene signature common to both training types has not yet been conducted. We therefore reanalyzed microarray datasets from human skeletal muscle samples obtained before and after endurance and resistance training. We first identified differentially expressed genes in each dataset, then performed a cross-dataset comparison to determine reproducible transcriptional responses across heterogeneous training protocols. Our results identified extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling-related genes as conserved transcriptional responses to both endurance and resistance training. Moreover, we observed modality-associated gene signatures: endurance training was associated with ECM-adhesion and matrix connectivity, whereas resistance training preferentially promoted ECM structural maturation and reinforcement. These findings suggest that ECM-centered transcriptional regulation is a conserved and reproducible feature of skeletal muscle responses to both endurance and resistance training. The central role of ECM remodeling in the plasticity of human skeletal muscle establishes a comprehensive framework for future mechanistic investigations into how exercise induces cellular adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.