Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026
Physician-patient sex dyads and management of dyslipidaemia and hypertension in primary care: findings from two population-based studies.
Observational study in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe objective of this study was to examine the associations between physician-patient sex dyads and the prevalence, treatment, and control of dyslipidaemia and hypertension in primary care. METHODS AND
resultsWe analysed two Swiss population-based studies using mixed-effects logistic models to compare dyslipidaemia and hypertension management across four physician-patient sex dyads (male physician-male patient, male physician-female patient, female physician-male patient, and female physician-female patient). Age-stratified analyses (≥50, ≥60 years) examined whether dyad-outcome associations differed by patient age. Among 8635 participants (54.9% females, with a mean age of 63 years in the CoLaus study and 48 years in the Bus Santé study), female participants had a lower prevalence of dyslipidaemia and hypertension than male participants across both study samples, irrespective of physician sex. For dyslipidaemia, in CoLaus, female participants had higher odds of lipid-lowering therapy, yet lower odds of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control, regardless of physician sex; in Bus Santé, female participants managed by male physicians had lower odds of lipid control (adjusted odds ratios (OR) 0.52, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.28-0.95) compared to male physician-male patient dyads. For hypertension, in CoLaus, female physician-female patient dyads had lower odds of antihypertensive treatment (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92) than male physician-male patient dyads; in Bus Santé, treatment and control did not differ significantly by dyad. Most differences were more pronounced in patients aged 60 years or older.
conclusionIn primary care, patterns of risk-factor management were associated with both patient and physician sex, with dyad-related differences that may reflect patient-sex patterns but differ in magnitude across regions and age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.