ArticleAcute and critical care2026
Association of extubation failure rate with patient outcomes.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking extubation failure as risk calibration in ventilator liberation.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While the propensity of evidence indicates the potential harm of failed extubation attempts, avoidance of any such risk may unnecessarily expose patients to prolonged invasive ventilation. We aimed to study the effects of extubation failure rate (EFR) on patient mortality and ventilation-free days (VFD). Methods: Adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit who underwent planned extubation were included. Extubation failure was defined as death or return to invasive positive pressure ventilation within 7 days from extubation. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and the secondary outcome was VFD. For each calendar month, the average 30-day mortality or VFD was plotted against the EFR, with polynomial regression models of increasing complexity fitted until no further increase in the adjusted R2 could be achieved. Results: Of the 774 patients included in final analysis, 262 (33.8%) failed extubation. Matched by the propensity for extubation failure, the 30-day mortality analysis for both groups showed no significant difference (18.4% vs. 16.2%, P=0.34). The relationship between monthly EFR and 30-day survival or VFD was best described by a quadratic regression model (adjusted R2=0.816 and 0.624, respectively). Based on this model, the optimal EFR was calculated at 33.1% (for 30-day survival) and 28.8% (for VFD). Conclusions: Our data support the notion of an optimal EFR. This optimum may be higher than the minimal failure rate achievable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.