ArticleCancer medicine2026
Longitudinal Monitoring of GRIm and HCC-GRIm Scores Reveals Immunologically Relevant Prognostic Indicators in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE Plus ICIs and Anti-VEGF Antibodies/TKIs.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical significance and peripheral immunological basis underlying the dynamic changes of Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score and the hepatocellular carcinoma-specific GRIm (HCC-GRIm) score in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibodies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included uHCC patients treated with TACE combined with ICIs and anti-VEGF antibodies or TKIs between July 2019 and August 2024. Primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), assessed at the first treatment evaluation at the end of the fourth cycle based on mRECIST criteria; secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). GRIm and HCC-GRIm scores were calculated at four key timepoints: baseline (Cycle 0), second cycle (Cycle 2), fourth cycle (Cycle 4), and disease progression (PD). Their distributions and trajectory patterns were analyzed in relation to OS. Peripheral immune markers were measured at each timepoint to characterize immune response dynamics. Comparisons of immune marker levels and trends were performed between GRIm high and low score groups, as well as between objective responders (OR) and nonresponders (nOR) across treatment stages. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to derive an integrated immune-metabolic index (PC1) from GRIm components, and its correlations with immune markers were evaluated.
resultsA total of 68 uHCC patients treated with TACE plus ICIs and anti-VEGF antibodies/TKIs were included. At the first evaluation, the ORR was 52.9% and the DCR 86.8%. After a median follow-up of 18.4 months, the cohort showed a median overall survival (mOS) of 30.1 months and a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 10.6 months. GRIm and HCC-GRIm scores remained stable across treatment phases, with their prognostic value for OS confined to baseline (Cycle 0) assessment (GRIm: p = 0.011; HCC-GRIm: p = 0.001). Patients with persistently low scores had significantly longer OS than those with increasing trajectories (GRIm: p = 0.025; HCC-GRIm: p = 0.048). Following treatment initiation, Igλ (p = 0.001), Igκ (p = 0.001), IgG (p = 0.002), and IgA (p = 0.001) levels showed an overall upward trend. At the first evaluation, these markers were significantly elevated in OR compared to baseline (Igλ [p = 0.022], Igκ [p = 0.032], IgG [p = 0.036], IgA [p = 0.019]), whereas no significant changes were observed in nOR (all p > 0.05). Among all timepoints, significant differences between high and low GRIm score groups were noted only at baseline, with higher Igλ (p = 0.001), Igκ (p = 0.014), and IgG (p = 0.009) levels in the high-score group. In patients with low GRIm scores, linear regression revealed increasing trends in Igλ (p = 0.042), Igκ (p = 0.017), and IgG (p = 0.019) during treatment. PCA showed PC1 correlated positively with Igλ (r = 0.259, p = 0.033), Igκ (r = 0.293, p = 0.015), IgG (r = 0.355, p = 0.003), and complement factor B (CFB; r = 0.314, p = 0.009).
conclusionThe GRIm and HCC-GRIm scores were shown to be effective prognostic indicators only at baseline in uHCC patients treated with TACE combined with ICIs and anti-VEGF antibodies or TKIs. Patients with low GRIm scores demonstrated treatment-associated increases in Igλ, Igκ, and IgG levels. Igλ, Igκ, and IgG represent measurable links between GRIm-defined risk categories, immune activation following treatment, and clinical outcomes. Integration of GRIm dynamics and immunoglobulin monitoring into clinical workflows may enhance risk stratification and support personalized treatment strategies in advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.