ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Decoding concept representations in aphasia after stroke.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many stroke survivors with aphasia struggle to map their thoughts into words or motor plans. Neuroprostheses that decode concept representations could help these individuals communicate by predicting the words, phrases, or sentences that they are struggling to produce. Here we decoded concept representations measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) from participants with different aphasia profiles. The decoders generated continuous word sequences that could describe the concepts that the participants were hearing about, seeing, or imagining. To forecast how this approach would generalize across the heterogeneity of aphasia profiles, we characterized how stroke affects the anatomical organization and information capacity of conceptual processing. Mapping how concepts are organized across the brain, we found that conceptual tuning during non-linguistic processing was largely consistent between the participants with aphasia and neurologically healthy participants. Comparing information processing between the participants with aphasia and neurologically healthy participants, we found that both groups processed similar amounts of non-linguistic information. Our findings indicate that concept representations can be largely spared in individuals with aphasia and demonstrate how these representations can be decoded to support communication.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.