ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Decoupling Detection and Classification to Improve Morphological Phenotype Analysis of Sickle Red Blood Cells in Full-Scope Microscopy.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microscopy-based analysis of red blood cell (RBC) morphology is widely used to study phenotypes in sickle cell disease (SCD). Although AI models have been developed to automate classification, most are trained on pre-cropped single-cell images and thus struggle with full-scope microscopic images containing densely packed cells and diverse morphologies, which require both accurate detection and fine-grained classification. We propose an end-to-end computational framework to identify individual RBCs in full-scope microscopy images and classify them into five morphological categories: discocytes (DO), echinocytes (E), elongated and sickle-shaped cells (ES), granular cells (G), and reticulocytes (R). We first evaluate advanced detection-classification models, including You Only Look Once (YOLO) and Detection Transformers (DETR), and demonstrate that while these models effectively detect cells, their classification performance falls short of specialized classifiers trained on single-cell images, particularly for minority phenotypes. To address this limitation, we introduce a two-step framework in which a YOLO-based detector localizes and crops individual cells from full-scope images, followed by a fine-tuned DenseNet121 ensemble classifier that assigns each cell to one of the five morphological categories. The proposed framework achieves a detection-level F1-score of 0.9661 and a weighted-average classification F1-score of 0.9708, with an overall classification accuracy of 97.06%. Compared with the single-step YOLO26n baseline, the two-step pipeline yields a macro-average F1-score improvement of +0.1675, with particularly substantial gains for minority classes (E: +0.1623; G: +0.2774; R: +0.2603). Overall, this hybrid framework demonstrates a practical strategy for adapting fast, general-purpose detection models to domain-specific biomedical tasks by combining them with specialized classifiers, delivering both efficiency and high accuracy for scientific and clinical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.