Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993384›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Sex differences in exploration-exploitation strategies during home-cage decision making.

Chantelle L Murrell, Alex A Legaria, Katie B McCullough, Andrew Nwacha, Monsurat O Nasiru, Sebastian Alves Ferreira Dias, Rebecca Chase, Mason R Barrett, Matt Gaidica, Naoki Hiratani and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chantelle L MurrellDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-4678-0601
Alex A LegariaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3722-6666
Katie B McCulloughDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.
Andrew NwachaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.
Monsurat O NasiruDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-1696-7402
Sebastian Alves Ferreira DiasDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.
Rebecca ChaseDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.
Mason R BarrettDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-2941-4859
Matt GaidicaDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0191-1899
Naoki HirataniDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.
Meaghan C CreedDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-2601
Joseph D DoughertyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6385-3997
Susan E MaloneyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5585-4722
Alexxai V KravitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5983-0218

Funding

WUIDDRC Supplement-Supporting the health and well-being of children with intellectual and developmental disability during COVID-19 pandemicP50HD103525 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY D MILBRANDT · 2020 to 2026
$15.5M
Systematic and scalable phenotyping of mouse mutants for neuropsychiatric disease geneticsRM1MH138313 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPH D DOUGHERTY, Harrison W Gabel · 2025 to 2026
$4.9M
Dopaminergic control of obesity in miceR01DK136810 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Alexxai V Kravitz · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Dissecting the role of ventral pallidal projections to nucleus accumbens in reward processingR01DA049924 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CREED, MEAGHAN C · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Accumbal adaptations that contribute to weight regain after weight lossR01DK138131 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Alexxai V Kravitz · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103525NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049924NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK136810NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK138131NIMH NIH HHS RM1 MH138313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exploration-exploitation trade-off refers to the conflict between using known strategies that reliably yield reward (exploitation) and sampling uncertain options that might yield better outcomes (exploration). Dysregulation of this balance is implicated in neuropsychiatric disease, and while sex differences in this balance have been described, the biological bases remain unclear. To quantify sex differences in this trade-off, we tested mice (n=74 male, 62 female) on four home-cage based foraging tasks with an operant pellet dispensing device, Feeding Experimentation Device 3 (FED3). Mice completed the tasks continuously over multiple days and the tasks were their only source of food. Across multiple tasks, males showed higher win-stay behaviour than females, indicating greater exploitation of previously rewarded actions, an effect that was modest in size but highly significant. Power analyses revealed that >30 mice per sex were needed to detect these modest but significant sex differences with 80% power. No consistent sex differences were observed in pellet intake, suggesting that differences in exploitation did not reflect differences in hunger drive or demand for pellets. Exploitation is a more efficient strategy when environmental parameters are fixed, while exploration can be more advantageous when parameters such as reward locations are changing and uncertain. We tested this idea by re-running our mice in a probabilistic foraging task, where actions led to uncertain probabilities of reward. While males continued to show higher levels of win-stay behaviour on this task, this no longer led to increases in accuracy. Behavioural modelling also supported this framework, demonstrating that stronger win-stay behaviour was most advantageous in deterministic models, and less advantageous in probabilistic models. Together, our findings demonstrate that male and female mice have small but significant differences in their exploration-exploitation balance, which leads to more accurate foraging in certain, but not uncertain, environments.

Identifiers

PMID41993384
PMCPMC13081908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.