ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Targeting the gut-immune-brain axis: pharmacological insights from depression in inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota and Metabolites: Orchestrating Depression Pathogenesis Through the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis's Neural, Immune, and Metabolic Routes.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Oral hydrogel systems in lower gastrointestinal disorders: From disease-based therapy to microbiota-guided design.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract with a remarkably high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, particularly Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The traditional monoaminergic hypothesis of depression is insufficient to explain the complex etiology of MDD, paving the way for new paradigms, such as the inflammatory hypothesis of depression. This narrative review critically explores IBD as a human clinical model to investigate the connection between chronic inflammation and depression. It is argued that gut dysbiosis, a central feature of IBD, is a fundamental trigger that, through a compromised gut barrier, drives systemic inflammation and, subsequently, neuroinflammation. We detail the molecular and cellular mechanisms that link intestinal inflammation to central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, including microglial activation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, and kynurenine pathway activation, which diverts tryptophan metabolism from serotonin synthesis to the production of neurotoxic metabolites. Robust epidemiological evidence demonstrating a bidirectional association between IBD and depression is discussed, suggesting a shared pathophysiology rather than a simple cause-and-effect relationship. Furthermore, we review the implications and emerging therapeutics, highlighting the antidepressant effects of immunobiologicals, such as anti-TNF therapies, and the potential of emerging interventions that target the microbiome, such as probiotics, psychobiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and anti-inflammatory diets. Furthermore, we address the limitations of the current literature, such as the lack of a quantitative definition for dysbiosis and the scarcity of clinical trials with integrated neuropsychiatric outcomes, and propose directions for future translational research. We conclude that IBD should be considered a systemic disease with significant psychiatric repercussions, advocating for an integrated therapeutic approach that combines immunomodulatory, neuromodulatory, and microbiological interventions to treat both gut and brain pathology effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.