Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993798›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

Bayesian inference captures metabolite-bacteria interactions in a microbial community.

Jack Jansma, Pietro Landi, Cang Hui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack JansmaBiodiversity Informatics Unit, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, Western cape, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-5790
Pietro LandiBiodiversity Informatics Unit, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, Western cape, South Africa.
Cang HuiBiodiversity Informatics Unit, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, Western cape, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macro-ecosystems, including the human gut, host a vast and diverse set of microbes that indirectly interact with each other through consuming and producing metabolites. Disruptions in this microbial network can affect macro-ecosystem functioning and, in the human gut, contribute to the onset and progression of various disorders, including diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and Parkinson's disease. A theoretical foundation for understanding the intricate and dynamic interactions between microbes and metabolites is essential for developing microbiota-targeted interventions to improve macro-ecosystem functioning and health. To this end, a precise mathematical framework is crucial to capture and quantify the complex dynamics of the microbial system. Here, we develop a dynamic network model of coupled ordinary differential equations and present a computational workflow that integrates a generative model with Bayesian inference for model identification. Our approach infers interaction rates, quantifying metabolite consumption and production from simulated time-series data within a Bayesian framework, incorporating prior knowledge and uncertainty quantification. We show that our approach is accurate and reliable in communities of various sizes, sparsity, and with different levels of observational noise. This workflow enables

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencedynamic network modelgut microbiotamathematical modellingmetabolite–bacteria networkmicrobial communitymicrobiota-targeted interventionsparameter estimation

Identifiers

PMID41993798
PMCPMC13082234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.