ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mapping English language teacher resilience: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Teacher resilience has emerged as a central construct for understanding professional sustainability, well-being, and adaptive functioning in English language teaching (ELT). Although conceptual and empirical interest in ELT teacher resilience has expanded rapidly, existing synthesis work has been limited by single-database coverage and inconsistent validation, constraining cumulative knowledge building and obscuring the field's intellectual and thematic structure. Methods: The study employed a multi-database bibliometric mapping design to consolidate and validate research on English language teacher resilience. Bibliographic records were independently retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus using identical search strings and inclusion parameters. Following cross-database validation of temporal, thematic, and geographic robustness, the datasets were merged and de-duplicated, yielding a final corpus of 293 publications. Bibliometric analyses were conducted in R using the bibliometrix package, including performance analysis, co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence networks, thematic mapping, and conceptual structure analysis. Results: Results indicated that ELT teacher resilience research remained marginal until 2018 but entered a phase of rapid expansion from 2021 onward. Knowledge production was concentrated among a small core of authors, journals, and countries, with limited international collaboration in high-output contexts. Co-citation analysis revealed a highly cohesive intellectual structure anchored in positive psychology, teacher emotion research, and adaptive models of professional functioning. Keyword and thematic analyses showed that resilience functioned as an integrative construct embedded within emotional regulation, occupational stress, motivation, and well-being, rather than as an isolated trait. Despite thematic density, constructs such as teacher identity, motivation, and technology use remained weakly integrated. Discussion: The results position English language teacher resilience as a rapidly consolidating yet structurally imbalanced research domain. While the field demonstrates strong theoretical coherence and psychological grounding, persistent reliance on cross-sectional designs and uneven conceptual integration limit developmental and process-oriented understanding. The study underscores the value of multi-database bibliometric validation and highlights the need for longitudinal, integrative, and theoretically aligned future research in ELT resilience. These results further indicate that teacher education programs and educational authorities should embed structured, developmentally informed resilience support within professional development systems rather than relying on isolated well-being initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.