Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993949›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2026

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Different Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Areeba Shoaib, Hafsa Arshad Azam Raja, Pawan Kumar Thada, Ameer Haider Cheema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Hassan WaseemAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Zain Ul AbideenKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Areeba ShoaibDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hafsa Arshad Azam RajaRawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan.
Pawan Kumar ThadaSotang Primary Hospital, Solukhumbu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-8739
Ameer Haider CheemaUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertension affects over 1.3 billion globally, many remain uncontrolled, and aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) are emerging as a treatment. This network meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of ASI regimens in hypertensive patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect were searched till December 2025. We conducted a frequentist network meta-analysis using RStudio version 4.3.3 with the "meta" and "netmeta" packages. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Baxdrostat 1 mg, 2 mg, lorundrostat 100 mg once daily, 12.5 mg twice daily, 25 mg twice daily, 50 mg once daily, 50 mg and escalation to 100 mg, osilodrostat 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg once daily, vicadrostat 10, 20, and 3 mg plus empagliflozin, and 20 mg significantly reduced the systolic blood pressure (SBP), where the baxdrostat 2 mg ( Conclusion: The SBP and DBP were significantly reduced with the baxdrostat and lorundrostat regimens, although the risk of hyperkalemia increased. Adverse events were also higher in the lorundrostat regimens, whereas serious adverse events were comparable.

Indexed as

aldosterone synthase inhibitorhypertensionnetwork meta-analysisresistant hypertensionuncontrolled hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41993949
PMCPMC13080199

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.