ReviewToxicology reports2026
The autophagy switch: A critical determinant of arsenic-induced carcinogenesis and cancer therapy.
Review in Toxicology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenic, a widespread environmental toxicant and unexpectedly effective chemotherapeutic agent, has complex and significant effects on cellular homeostasis. Autophagy, a conserved lysosomal degradation process, plays a key role in arsenic's dual functions as a carcinogen and a treatment. While current reviews have documented interactions between arsenic and autophagy, this review introduces a new conceptual model: the "Autophagy Switch." We propose that the cellular choice between autophagy-assisted survival and autophagy-dependent death is not simply black and white but exists within a dynamic balance called the Arsenic Contextual Triad-comprising chemical form, exposure pattern (dose and duration), and the cell's oncogenic background. We compile evidence showing how this switch influences outcomes across the cancer spectrum, from promoting skin cancer through p62/Nrf2 feedback loops to breaking down oncogenic factors like PML-RARα and BCR-ABL in leukemia. Additionally, we critically assess the therapeutic potential of targeting this switch, emphasizing how drugs that either inhibit or promote autophagy can work together with arsenic trioxide (ATO) to combat drug resistance in solid tumors such as glioblastoma and ovarian cancer. By shifting from simple descriptions to a detailed mechanistic and contextual understanding, this review offers a valuable guide for future research aiming to harness the autophagy switch for cancer prevention and personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.