Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41994128›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Provider Perceptions of the Impact of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing on Care and Management.

Rachel Palmquist, Chelsea Solorzano, Brian J Shayota, Dawn Bentley, Carrie Torr, Julie M Porter, Emily Fleming, LeeAnn Dempsey, Martin Tristani-Firouzi, Joshua L Bonkowsky and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rachel PalmquistUniversity of Utah.
Chelsea SolorzanoUniversity of Utah.
Brian J ShayotaUniversity of Utah.
Dawn BentleyUniversity of Utah.
Carrie TorrUniversity of Utah.
Julie M PorterUniversity of Utah.
Emily FlemingUniversity of Utah.
LeeAnn DempseyUniversity of Utah.
Martin Tristani-FirouziUniversity of Utah.
Joshua L BonkowskyUniversity of Utah.
Timothy M BahrIntermountain Healthcare.
Sabrina Malone JenkinsUniversity of Utah.

Funding

Addressing the research-practice gap in the implementation of rapid whole genome sequencing in the NICUK08HG013111 · NHGRI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Sabrina Malone Jenkins · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS K08 HG013111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) is emerging as the standard-of-care for critically ill neonates and children. In this study, we surveyed healthcare providers to explore the impact of rWGS on medical decision making, patient management, and communication with families. Patients and Methods: We designed a survey to measure provider perceived impact of rWGS in critically ill neonates and children sequenced at a single center, Primary Children's Hospital (Salt Lake City, UT). The survey was completed by the primary critical care provider or primary specialist provider following rWGS result return. Survey results were stratified by result type and unit. Results: The majority of results (81%, 140/172) were considered 'Useful' or 'Very useful' and increased clarity for the care team (52%, 89/171) and family (62%, 96/156). Providers identified at least one change in management for the majority of results (57%, 98/171). Conclusions: This study found positive provider perceptions for rWGS in both pediatric non-ICU and ICU hospitalizations. A majority of providers identified the rWGS results as useful, and impactful for management. Standardized evaluation of the care team's perception of clinical management at the time of result return is a helpful measure for understanding the clinical utility of rWGS. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: No clinical trial registry. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Utah (IRB_00131255) as an exempt study. A consent cover letter was utilized and consent to participate was given by completing and returning the questionnaire.

Indexed as

Hospital GeneticsMedical GeneticsNeonatal GeneticsProvider SurveyRapid Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41994128
PMCPMC13082159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.