SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Yellow fever virus infection in non-human primates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, seroprevalence, and epizootic case reports (1950-2025).
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond primates: exploring the potential role of other mammalian hosts in yellow fever virus ecology.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Yellow fever epizootics among non-human primates in Huila, Colombia, 2025-2026.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Yellow fever remains a major mosquito-borne viral disease of global public health and ecological concern. Non-human primates (NHPs) are central to the sylvatic transmission cycle and serve as key sentinels of viral circulation. Yet, evidence on yellow fever virus (YFV) infection in NHPs is dispersed and has not been synthesized comprehensively. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze global data on the prevalence and seroprevalence of YFV infection in NHP, and to summarize molecular, clinical, and pathological findings from reported epizootic cases. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and SciELO for studies published between 1950 and 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies reporting YFV prevalence or seroprevalence in NHPs were included in the quantitative syntheses, and individual case reports were analyzed separately. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with subgroup analyses by geographic region, diagnostic method, and primate genus. Results: Thirty-nine articles assessing 7,183 NHP met the inclusion criteria; 28 contributed to meta-analyses, and 10 provided 19 individual case reports. Pooled molecular prevalence by RT-PCR was 30.7%, and prevalence by immunohistochemistry was 43.4%, both with substantial between-study heterogeneity. Seroprevalence estimates ranged from 5.0 to 36.4% across assays and settings. Higher infection metrics were observed in howler monkeys and titi monkeys. All reported individual cases were fatal and predominantly associated with severe hepatic and multisystemic pathology. Most data originated from the Americas, particularly Brazil, with limited representation from African endemic regions. Conclusion: YFV infection in NHP is widespread, often severe, and epidemiologically significant. Our findings underscore the critical sentinel role of NHPs and highlight the need to strengthen integrated One Health surveillance systems to inform prevention and control strategies, particularly in the context of the current resurgence of yellow fever in Latin America and persistent data gaps in Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.