ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Interpretable Machine Learning for LPR Risk Estimation: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Based on RSI and RFS scores, an interpretable machine learning model was constructed to identify risk factors for LPR, aiming to screen high-risk patients requiring 24-h pH-impedance monitoring and provide reference for clinical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective case-control study included 537 patients who underwent painless gastroscopy (June 2024-June 2025), split into training ( Results: Six independent LPR predictors were identified: arytenoid IPCL dilation, abdominal circumference, reflux esophagitis, alcohol consumption history, right lateral sleeping position, and GEFV grade III/IV. The random forest model performed best (F1 = 0.725, recall = 0.716, accuracy = 0.727, precision = 0.734), with Bootstrap-validated AUC of 0.815 (95% CI: 0.753-0.873). Calibration curve showed good fit, decision curve analysis confirmed clinical net benefit across thresholds. SHAP analysis ranked feature contributions as: arytenoid IPCL dilation, abdominal circumference, reflux esophagitis, alcohol consumption history, right lateral sleeping position, GEFV grade III/IV. A web-based calculator was deployed (URL: http://127.0.0.1:7292). Conclusion: This study constructed and validated an interpretable machine learning model integrating endoscopic and clinical indicators. The model demonstrates good discriminative ability and calibration and can serve as an auxiliary screening tool for patients with suspected LPR to help clinicians identify high-risk individuals who require priority 24-h MII-pH monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.