ArticleInternational journal of vascular medicine2026
A Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Programme in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study.
Article in International journal of vascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05961943 (Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes of the "RESPONSE-2" Program in Reducing Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes of the "RESPONSE-2" Program in Reducing Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have high levels of sedentary behaviour (SB), which contributes to declining mobility, poorer quality of life and increased cardiovascular risk; however, few studies have targeted reducing SB in this population. Objective: The study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a 12-week remotely delivered intervention designed to reduce sedentary time in people with PAD. Methods: This was a single-arm, single-centre feasibility study in participants with PAD. The intervention combined online education, a wearable physical activity tracker and weekly coaching calls. At baseline and 12 weeks, SB and physical activity were measured with activPAL, functional capacity was assessed remotely using the Timed Walk app for the 6-min walk test and semistructured interviews were conducted at 12 weeks to evaluate acceptability. Results: Thirty participants provided consent (77% recruitment rate) and took part in the study, with 21 (70%) attending follow-up. Valid activPAL data at baseline and follow-up was provided by 18 participants (60% of those consented). At baseline, participants spent 63% of their waking day sitting (9.58 h/day), which was slightly lower at 12 weeks (60%). Qualitative analysis identified four themes covering awareness, motivation, engagement and barriers. Participants valued weekly calls and feedback on physical activity from the wearable. Conclusion: Overall, the intervention was feasible and acceptable, and data suggest that it may reduce sedentary time. Methods to enhance retention and compliance with the activPAL would be needed for a larger trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05961943.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.