ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Facial micro-movements as a proxy of increasingly erratic heart rate variability while experiencing pressure pain.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The sensation of pain varies from person to person. These patterns of individual variation are difficult to capture using coarse subjective self-reports. However, they are important when prescribing therapies and tailoring them to each person's own sensations. Pain can be experienced differently by the same person and can fluctuate based on context; yet, most analyses treat the problem with a one-size-fits-all model. Methods: In this work, we introduce a series of assays to assess pressure pain across tasks with different motoric and cognitive demands, in relation to a resting state. In a cohort of healthy individuals, we examine pain-free Results: Using the MMS peaks, we find that the continuous Gamma family of probability distribution functions best fits the frequency histograms of both the facial and heart data. Furthermore, we find that the Gamma shape and scale parameters in both signals span a scaling power law whereby, as the noise-to-signal ratio (Gamma scale parameter) increases, so does the randomness of the stochastic process. We find that as the heart IBI becomes more erratic (noisier and more random), the facial ophthalmic region also increases in noise and randomness, with higher linear correlation for tasks requiring haptic feedback ( Conclusion: Increases in transfer entropy show that recent past activity (~167 ms back) of the heart IBI and facial data combined lower the uncertainty in predicting the present ophthalmic facial activity, suggesting that this facial region may serve as a proxy for the increasingly dysregulated heart. These results have implications for the detection and monitoring of pressure pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.