ReviewPsychiatric genetics2026
Are polygenic scores for psychiatric and substance use outcomes "ready" for clinical application? Current state and next steps.
Review in Psychiatric genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite drastic advances in psychiatric genetics, comparatively little attention has focused on the translation of those discoveries into real-world impact. This paper reviews the processes and considerations for integrating new techniques into clinical practice and provides an overview of areas of medicine where polygenic scores (PGS) are already being incorporated. We evaluate current PGS across three areas of psychiatry (depression, substance use disorders, and schizophrenia) against the criteria used by the National Electronic Medical Records and Genomics consortium to select PGS to study in a clinical context, finding that the PGS for psychiatric conditions are comparable to the PGS being implemented in clinical practice for other medical conditions. We conclude by discussing next steps for evaluating psychiatric PGS for clinical implementation including ethical issues that must be considered, and the need for more research on clinical utility to evaluate whether and how PGS can be used to improve behavioral health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.