Observational studyCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Treatment Response and Prognosis of Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System: A Real-World Observation.
Observational study in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
subjectTo analyze the treatment response in patients with primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) in a large vasculitis cohort.
methodIn this single-center retrospective observational study, we assessed treatment, relapses, remission, and outcome of patients with PACNS. We pooled the patients' relapses under different treatments as well as various immunotherapies. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors independently associated with relapse and those associated with good functional status. The time of observation was 96 months.
resultThe cohort comprised 80 patients, with 38 diagnosed with pathologically confirmed PACNS and 42 with clinically diagnosed PACNS, with a median follow-up duration of 18 months (range 3-96). Treatment comprised acute-phase induction therapy with high-dose corticosteroids, alone or combined with immunosuppressive agents, followed by remission-phase maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, primarily with cyclophosphamide, rituximab, or mycophenolate mofetil. Following treatment, 49 patients (61.3%) achieved remission and 70 (87.5%) attained favorable functional outcomes. The overall relapse rate was 35%. Group 3 demonstrated significantly higher baseline disease severity (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified seizures and cognitive impairment as predictors of relapse.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that a majority of PACNS patients exhibit a favorable response to therapy. For patients presenting with more severe disease at diagnosis, long-term maintenance therapy following remission induction with glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.