Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995460›Full record

ReviewVeterinary and comparative oncology2026

Critical Questions in Genomic Diagnostics for Veterinary Oncology: What We Need to Know.

Sharadha Sakthikumar, Giulia Siravegna, Michelle E White, Douglas H Thamm, Esther Chon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharadha SakthikumarTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-8264
Giulia SiravegnaNatera, Inc (Oncology), San Carlos, California, USA.
Michelle E WhiteTranslational Medical Insights, LLC, Rocky River, Ohio, USA.
Douglas H ThammFlint Animal Cancer Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-7767
Esther ChonChOncology, LLC, Carmel, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-8157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic diagnostics are increasingly integrated into veterinary oncology practice, offering the possibility of refined approaches to tumour classification, risk stratification and therapeutic guidance through high-throughput sequencing technologies. In human medicine, the clinical utility of genomic testing is underpinned by rigorous analytical and clinical validation, robust regulatory oversight and an expanding evidence base linking specific genomic alterations to disease phenotypes and therapeutic responses. In contrast, genomic testing in veterinary oncology remains underdeveloped, with limited standardisation, sparse species-specific validation and frequent reliance on extrapolation from human data. This review delineates the current landscape of genomic testing in veterinary oncology, emphasising methodological considerations in assay design, validation requirements, and clinical interpretation. We highlight the need for analytical rigour, including the use of in silico and orthogonal validation strategies, and advocate for the establishment of performance benchmarks that account for assay sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility in relevant canine populations. In addition, we address the interpretive challenges posed by variants of uncertain significance and the limitations of inferring clinical actionability from human oncology frameworks. A critical, question-driven approach is proposed to guide clinicians in evaluating the validity and applicability of genomic tests, focusing on test validation, intended clinical use and the functional relevance of identified alterations. Advancing genomic diagnostics in veterinary oncology will require coordinated efforts to improve transparency, expand validation cohorts and align clinical expectations with the current evidentiary base. These steps are essential to realising the full potential of precision medicine in veterinary oncology while maintaining scientific and clinical integrity.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesGenetic TestingGenomicsNeoplasmsVeterinary MedicineAnimalsDogsReproducibility of Resultscanine cancergenomic testingtargeted panelvalidationwhole‐exome sequencingwhole‐genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41995460
PMCPMC13456587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.