ReviewMedicine2026
The trends and hotspots of gut microbiota for breast cancer from 2005 to 2024: A bibliometric and visual analysis.
Review in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor among women in the world, and it is also the most common cancer type that causes female deaths. Accumulating evidence has indicated a close relationship between the gut microbiota (GM) and BC, encompassing aspects such as clinical diagnosis, carcinogenic mechanisms, and treatment. To date, no study has conducted a bibliometric analysis concerning BC and GM. Bibliometrics, as a methodological discipline for quantitative analysis of academic literature, is not only applied in basic medical research but also in clinical medical research.
methodsA search for literature was conducted related to BC and GM in the Web of Science Core Collection database from January 1, 2005 to July 31, 2024. Tools such as Microsoft PowerPoint 2019, Microsoft Excel 2019, VOSviewer 1.6.20, and CiteSpace 6.3.R1, were used to visualize not only publishing trends but also hotspots.
resultsA total of 842 articles is included, including 456 articles and 386 reviews. Since 2016, the publishing industry has experienced rapid growth. As expected, the United States ranks highest in terms of literature quantity and average citation count. The University of Illinois is the most active institution, whereas the National College of Ireland receives the highest average number of citations. The 3 researchers with the greatest influence are Bai, Peter, Miko, Edit, and Ujlaki, Gyula. The International Journal of Molecular Science has accounted for the largest number of publications, while Science ranked as the most highly cited journal. According to keyword and topic analyses, "quality of life" and "tumor microenvironment" will be the hotspots and frontiers of future research.
conclusionOverall, this field is receiving increasing attention. We found that the future research hotspots of BC/GM may focus on the mechanisms of tumor occurrence, microbiota combination therapy, and the development of new predictive biomarkers, providing effective suggestions and new insights for scholars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.