ArticleMedicine2026
Drug-induced neutropenia: A comprehensive pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and management of neutropenia in adults: Expert guidance.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-induced neutropenia (DIN) deserves both clinicians' and researchers' attention for the serious clinical consequences. This study aimed to conduct an exploratory analysis of DIN reports in the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database to identify drugs associated with neutropenia. A disproportionality analysis of DIN was conducted using reports submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024. Both the reporting odds ratio algorithms and the information component were applied to identify an association between target drugs and DIN events. A total of 223,736 DIN cases were found, and 254 drugs were identified as potentially associated with neutropenia. The top-ranked drug categories were "monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates," "other antineoplastic agents," "protein kinase inhibitors," "direct-acting antivirals," "antimetabolites," "alkylating agents," and "immunosuppressants." The top 5 drugs ranked by number of cases were clozapine, lenalidomide, rituximab, palbociclib, and carboplatin. The top 5 drugs ranked by reporting odds ratio signal strength were calcium levofolinate, vinorelbine, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, fludarabine, and daunorubicin. This comprehensive pharmacovigilance study identified drugs potentially associated with neutropenia, which can help clinicians and researchers further understand DIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.