Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996152›Full record

SynthesisJMIR aging2026

"Living Inside the Walls": Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Weitong Li, Ziqi Mei, WenJing Tu, Yulei Song, Yayi Zhao, Yamei Bai, Guihua Xu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weitong Li *School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-3085
Ziqi Mei *Department of Psychology, Academy of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-9108
WenJing TuSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8615-927X
Yulei SongSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9498-8004
Yayi ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0748-7261
Yamei BaiSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7283-0761
Guihua XuSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-3253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial isolation is a prevalent issue among older people in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), with profound negative impacts on their quality of life and mental health. However, the authentic experiences and underlying mechanisms of social isolation among older people in LTCFs remain understudied. A nuanced understanding of these experiences is essential for designing targeted nursing interventions.

objectiveThis study aimed to systematically review and synthesize qualitative evidence to explore the experiences of social isolation among older adults in LTCFs and analyze them in terms of causes, mechanisms, outcomes, and strategies.

methodsA systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis were conducted. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Weipu (VIP) with no restriction on the start year, up to February 2025. Two reviewers (WL and ZM) independently screened studies, extracted data using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, and assessed study quality with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Qualitative data synthesis was performed following Thomas and Harden's thematic and content analysis method, including line-by-line coding of participant quotes, organizing codes into descriptive themes, and developing analytical themes.

resultsA total of 4856 papers were retrieved through systematic searches, and 14 qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Four overarching analytical themes were identified: (1) root cause: person-environment mismatch (encompassing 4 interrelated dimensions: imbalance between declining individual capacity and insufficient environmental support, negative self-perception paired with inadequate positive environmental feedback, personal biases conflicting with homogeneous institutional social ecology, and disrupted social roles due to rigid institutional management); (2) overt behavioral patterns: proactive isolation, defensive isolation, and adaptive isolation; (3) inner emotional experiences: feelings of confinement, sorrow, and weariness; and (4) strategies for restoring person-environment match: active engagement in interaction, rational acceptance of coexistence, and passive avoidance and withdrawal. Notably, person-environment mismatch was confirmed as the core mechanism driving the onset and persistence of social isolation in this population.

conclusionsPerson-environment mismatch is the fundamental driver of social isolation among older adults in LTCFs. Interventions should prioritize restoring person-environment alignment-including optimizing physical environments, reconstructing supportive social environments, and enhancing psychological empowerment. Future studies should focus on developing tools to quantify person-environment matching degrees in LTCFs and conduct longitudinal evaluations of targeted interventions to further reduce social isolation and promote active social participation among older people.

Indexed as

Social IsolationAgedHumansLong-Term CareNursing Home ResidentsQualitative ResearchQuality of Lifelong-term care facilityLTCFmeta-synthesisolder peoplequalitative researchsocial isolationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41996152
PMCPMC13135159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.