ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Co-Design of strategies to enhance access to Virtual Urgent Care models by equity-deserving populations.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual urgent care (VUC) was introduced in 2020 across the province of Ontario, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide urgent care for lower-acuity health needs for patients who did not require in-person care. Persons from equity-deserving populations (EDPs) often face barriers in using virtual models of care. To raise awareness and improve uptake of VUC among EDPs, a World Café was organized that convened a diverse group of individuals from healthcare, community, research, and/or people with living/or lived experience of health conditions to co-design VUC outreach strategies. The panel consisted of 36 persons (22 invitees; 14 members of the study team) who participated in a one-day, in-person event to reflect on key considerations related to VUC delivery for EDPs through facilitated small and large group discussions. We recorded all discussions via note-takers and analyzed the notes using content analysis. From this analysis, we identified three categories: a) lack of awareness about VUC and accessibility barriers; b) addressing issues of digital literacy and ensuring the perceived credibility of VUC; and c) opportunities for advancing VUC. Given the potential of VUC to serve as a culturally safe modality for EDPs, the World Café event served as a meaningful opportunity to exchange knowledge on health equity and to co-design strategies for improved awareness and uptake of VUC by EDPs.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.