ArticlePloS one2026
Hybrid feature-selection and diversity-guided stacking framework for interpretable ensemble learning: Application to COVID-19 mortality prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable predictive modeling in high-dimensional biomedical data requires a balance between accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency. However, existing ensemble methods often overlook model diversity or rely on ad hoc feature-selection approaches, which limit generalizability. This study introduces a hybrid feature-selection and diversity-guided stacking framework designed to improve robustness and scalability across clinical and other data-intensive domains.
methodsThe proposed framework integrates a hybrid feature-selection pipeline-combining Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Sequential Backward Elimination (SBE), and Lasso regression-to reduce multicollinearity and overfitting. It also employs a diversity-aware stacking strategy that constructs sub-model sets based on pairwise diversity measures (Disagreement, Yule's Q, and Cohen's Kappa) and non-pairwise metrics (Entropy and Kohavi-Wolpert). Sixteen base classifiers and five meta-learners were trained using repeated 10-fold cross-validation. The framework was evaluated using data from 4,778 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with 116 clinical and laboratory attributes, preprocessed using robust scaling and ROSE-based class balancing.
resultsThe optimal configuration, which stacked Random Forest and XGBoost models using a Neural Network meta-learner, achieved 91.4% accuracy (95% CI: 89.8-92.8), AUC = 0.955, F1 = 0.801, and MCC = 0.746, outperforming the best individual model (AdaBoost, 90.2%). Training time (~450 s) and per-case inference time (<0.2 s) demonstrated computational feasibility. Feature-importance analysis and SHAP-based interpretation confirmed clinical relevance and interpretability.
conclusionsThe hybrid feature-selection and diversity-guided stacking framework improves predictive accuracy and interpretability while maintaining computational efficiency. Although validated using COVID-19 mortality data, the approach is broadly applicable to biomedical, environmental, and engineering prediction tasks that require interpretable and scalable ensemble learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.