ArticlePloS one2026
Non-lethal imaging and modeling approaches for estimating dry mass in aquatic larvae.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body mass is crucial for scaling and comparing physiological rates. Specifically, dry body mass is important in determining an organism's metabolic rate since it excludes metabolically inactive water weight. While obtaining repeated measurements of body mass throughout an individual's lifetime is trivial, we can obtain only a single estimate of dry body mass since classical methods require end-point euthanasia. Here, we present imaging and modeling techniques for estimating individual dry body mass in African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) tadpoles, which allow repeated sampling of the same individuals. We applied allometric principles and tested whether external anatomy would yield reliable estimates of dry body mass. Specifically, we describe a procedure to embed tadpoles in agarose media for obtaining morphological data in 3-D and then we evaluate dry mass predictions among nine cross-validated maximum likelihood and machine learning models. The best performing and most flexible model was an allometric model that used estimates of body volume to predict dry body mass. However, other models based on wet body mass or fewer input variables may also be logistically tractable. This research develops a foundation for continued research on the biological importance of dry body mass, particularly in the context of development and physiological ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.