ReviewLab animal2026
From insights to innovations: evaluating preclinical paradigms in demyelinating disease therapeutics.
Review in Lab animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis and leukodystrophies are on the rise, posing substantial challenges due to their progressive nature and the current limitations of therapies that effectively restore lost myelin. Over the past decade, advancements in regenerative neuroscience, including cutting-edge stem cell therapies, advanced biomaterials and groundbreaking gene-editing technologies, offer promising avenues for remyelination, immunomodulation and neural repair. Yet, to successfully transition these innovations into clinical therapies, we need robust preclinical models that accurately reflect disease pathology and predict treatment efficacy. This Review offers a thorough overview of the preclinical models utilized in regenerative neurology for demyelinating diseases, highlighting the rapid progress in biomaterial and gene-editing research, which requires meticulous testing and validation in both in vitro and in vivo environments. We begin by explaining the pathophysiology of demyelination, then provide an exhaustive discussion on various preclinical models, including toxin-induced, autoimmune, genetic, viral-induced and large animal models. This is followed by an exploration of emerging regenerative strategies, from cell-based and pharmacological approaches to bioengineered techniques, and we conclude with an analysis of current challenges, translational barriers and future directions in the field. By synthesizing insights from multiple disciplines, this Review strives to engage a diverse audience eager to connect laboratory discoveries with clinical applications in regenerative neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.