Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998276›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Genome mining of insecticidal toxins and comparative genomic analysis of Lysinibacillus pinotti VCRC B653, a promising mosquito biocontrol agent with dual larvicidal and oviposition-attractant activities.

Sahadiya Mandodan, Mathivanan Ashokkumar, Bhavna Gupta, Aneha Kunnikuruvan, Abhisubesh Vijayakumar, Kakhuangailiu Gangmei, Jibi Lukose, Bhagyashree Bora, Akash Ashok Dhotre, Geetha Irudayaraj and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sahadiya MandodanDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Mathivanan AshokkumarDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Bhavna GuptaICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Madurai Field Station, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, 625002, India.
Aneha KunnikuruvanDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Abhisubesh VijayakumarDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Kakhuangailiu GangmeiDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Jibi LukoseDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Bhagyashree BoraDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Akash Ashok DhotreDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Geetha IrudayarajDivision of Microbiology, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Department of Health Research (Ministry of Health & and Family Welfare, Govt. of India), Medical Complex Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Paramasivan RajaiahICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (VCRC), Madurai Field Station, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, 625002, India. rpsivan2000@gmail.com.

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research IM-2215Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt. of India, and NBCFDC UGC Ref. No.: 191620027860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial entomopathogens are widely used in mosquito control, however, the functional and genomic potential of many promising strains remains insufficiently explored. Here, we report Lysinibacillus pinotti VCRC B653, isolated from indian soil, with potent mosquitocidal activity. The spore–crystal complex showed remarkable toxicity against Culex(Cx.) quinquefasciatus, Anopheles(An.) stephensi, and Aedes(Ae.) aegypti (LC₅₀:0.014, 0.215, and 0.8 µg/mL, respectively), while remaining non-toxic to beneficial aquatic organisms. Additionally, cell-free supernatant strongly attracted for oviposition in Cx. quinquefasciatus (OAI:0.94 at 0.5% CFS). GC–MS profiling identified 22 volatile compounds, including benzeneacetic acid and 2-piperidinone, compounds previously associated with insecticidal and antimicrobial activities. Whole-genome sequencing revealed a 4.76 Mb genome (GC content: 37.1%) comprising 4948 predicted coding sequences and no plasmids. Phylogenomic analysis placed the isolate within Lysinibacillus pinotti, supported by 99.47% ANI and 96% dDDH with type strain Lysinibacillus pinotti PB211. Comparative genomics showed > 90% protein homology with PB211, alongside 511 unique genes, and diverse biosynthetic gene clusters (NRPS, PKS, and RiPPs), highlighting strain-specific features that may enhance ecological adaptability and mosquitocidal potential. Genome mining uncovered multiple insecticidal toxin families, including Tpp1Aa1/BinA, Tpp2Aa1/BinB, Cry48Aa3–Tpp49Aa4 with distinct RicinB-like lectin and P42 crystal toxin domains, and aerolysin-like β-pore-forming proteins (Mpp, Mtx, Spp). Analysis of conserved pore-forming and receptor-binding motifs provided a molecular explanation for the high larvicidal potency. Genome-based safety evaluation revealed a low probability of human pathogenicity and absence of virulence. Collectively, these findings establish L. pinotti VCRC B653 as a safe and potent mosquito-control agent and expand genomic resources to support the development of targeted and sustainable biocontrol.

Indexed as

BacillaceaeBacterial ToxinsCulicidaeGenome, BacterialInsecticidesAedesAnimalsAnophelesBiological Control AgentsCulexGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGenomicsLarvaMosquito ControlOvipositionPest Control, BiologicalBacterial ToxinsBiological Control AgentsInsecticidesGenome miningPore-forming toxinsVolatile organic compoundsWhole-genome sequence

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.