ArticleOral radiology2026
Automated periodontitis diagnosis and staging using an end-to-end deep learning model on panoramic dental radiographs.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Panoramic Radiographs to AI-Assisted Radiographic Periodontal Charting: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive deep learning model utilizing YOLOv11 for the automatic segmentation of teeth, detection of anatomical landmarks, and staging of periodontitis through the analysis of panoramic radiographs.
methodsA total of 607 panoramic radiographs were annotated by qualified dentists The YOLOv11-based system executed tooth segmentation and classified teeth into four anatomical categories, subsequently identifying six critical landmarks to facilitate the calculation of radiographic bone loss. The performance of the model was assessed using metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, and mean average precision (mAP). Agreement with the assessments provided by dentists was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
resultsThe segmentation model demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving a precision of 0.981, recall of 0.984, F1-score of 0.983, and an mAP50 of 0.994. The keypoint detection models also exhibited robust performance, with precision and recall exceeding 0.951 and mAP50 surpassing 0.958. Correlation and agreement with the assessments of dental professionals were highest for incisors (PCC = 0.877; ICC = 0.871) and lowest for canines (PCC = 0.712; ICC = 0.705) (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe proposed YOLOv11-based framework facilitates automated, high-precision tooth segmentation, landmark detection, and periodontitis staging, thereby providing a reliable clinical decision support tool for the diagnosis of periodontal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.