ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Implementing integrative nursing for oncology inpatients: a retrospective analysis of project-related routine data from 2021 to 2023.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study explored the implementation of integrative nursing (IN) interventions in oncology inpatient care within a dedicated project. As part of an IN consultation service, trained integrative nurses delivered external naturopathic, non-pharmacological interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize patients receiving IN interventions and to describe how these interventions are implemented and applied in oncological inpatient care.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed routine project-related data collected at Ulm University Hospital between 2021 and 2023. Recorded variables included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, type and frequency of IN interventions, and immediate patient reaction. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were examined using content analysis.
resultsHealthcare professionals requested an IN consultation for 381 patients, of whom 361 (94.8%) agreed to participate. The majority were female (62.3%; n = 225) and between 60 and 69 years of age (33.5%; n = 121). In total, 1910 IN interventions were carried out, with a median of four IN interventions per patient (M = 5.3 ± 4.6; r = 1-30). Most IN interventions targeted the lower limbs (38.7%; n = 740), most frequently using rhythmic embrocation (70.9%; n = 1355) and solum oil (39.6%; n = 757). Immediately after the IN intervention, the most commonly observed patient reactions were relaxation (67.5%; n = 726) and deeper breathing (37.5%; n = 403).
conclusionThe high level of acceptance and the continuous increase in utilization suggest that IN was well implemented in clinical practice during the project, with positive short-term reactions from patients. Further intervention studies are needed to provide robust evidence of its efficacy and to support its long-term integration into routine hospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.