ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Bioremediation of dioxin-contaminated soils: Microbial approaches, field perspectives, and analytical challenges.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review of microbial exopolysaccharide for bioremediation of environmental pollutants and industrial waste toxicants using sustainable strategies: bottlenecks and future perspectives.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- An Integrated Strategy for Sustainable Dioxin Remediation: Sources, Places of Contamination, and Toxicity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) remain among the most challenging legacy soil contaminants because their extreme hydrophobicity and congener-specific toxicity combine with multi-decadal persistence and strong sequestration in aged matrices. Over the past decades, bioremediation has been explored as a lower-impact alternative to disruptive physicochemical treatments, but translation from laboratory success to field performance remains limited by the bioaccessibility bottleneck, heterogeneous redox conditions, and the difficulty of demonstrating durable risk reduction. This review synthesizes bacterial, fungal, and bio-hybrid strategies for PCDD/F transformation in soils, emphasizing the process logic that underpins most concepts: anaerobic reductive dechlorination of highly chlorinated congeners (often associated with organohalide-respiring taxa such as Dehalococcoides) followed by aerobic oxidative steps that become feasible once substitution is reduced (e.g., dioxygenase-driven pathways in sphingomonads and actinobacteria). In parallel, ligninolytic fungi expand the treatable congener space through extracellular oxidoreductases (laccases and peroxidases) that can access sorbed substrates and generate more polar intermediates, supporting hybrid schemes that distribute functions across communities or treatment stages. A central message is that congener disappearance or toxic equivalency (TEQ) decline alone is not sufficient evidence of detoxification: biotransformation can produce intermediate products and non-monotonic toxicity trajectories, while many transformation products remain poorly characterized in terms of persistence, mobility, and bioactivity. We therefore discuss analytical and experimental design requirements for regulatorily robust evaluation, highlighting the continued role of chemical analysis for congener-resolved quantification and the complementary value of bioassays and untargeted screening workflows to capture emerging by-products and unexpected activity. By linking mechanistic pathways, biosafety constraints, and monitoring resolution, this review identifies key limitations and research priorities for environmentally robust and regulatorily acceptable bioremediation of PCDD/F-contaminated soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.