Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998459›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Self-reported and task-based measures of attention control are distinct.

Julie A DiCarlo, Alexander P Burgoyne, Charlotte Conroy, David J Lin, Nathan Ward

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie A DiCarloDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA. Julie.dicarlo@tufts.edu.
Alexander P BurgoyneHuman Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), Alexandria, VA, USA.
Charlotte ConroyDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
David J LinCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 490 Boston Ave, Medford, MA, USA.
Nathan WardDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention control, the ability to maintain focus while resisting distractions, is critical for executing goal-directed behaviors. Attention control has been measured via tasks and self-reports, and some studies have started to examine the degree to which these different measurement types correspond. We investigated the relationship between task-based and self-reported attention control measures in two studies. In Study 1 (online), participants completed an anti-saccade task follow by self-reported measures of attention control. Anti-saccade task performance was not associated with self-reported attention control shifting or distractibility. In Study 2 (in-person), we incorporated additional task-based measures of attention control and found results consistent with Study 1 (i.e., no association between self-reported and task-based measures of attention control). Bayes factors provided evidence in support of the null hypothesis, or the absence of a relationship between self-reported and task-based measures of attention control. Factor analyses revealed self-reported and task-based measures of attention control separated into two uncorrelated factors. Taken together, our findings suggest that task-based and self-reported attention control measures may not reflect the same underlying construct, which has implications for study design and research on individual differences in attention control.

Indexed as

AttentionSelf ReportAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesYoung AdultAttention controlMeasurementSelf-reportTask-based

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.