ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Self-reported and task-based measures of attention control are distinct.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention control, the ability to maintain focus while resisting distractions, is critical for executing goal-directed behaviors. Attention control has been measured via tasks and self-reports, and some studies have started to examine the degree to which these different measurement types correspond. We investigated the relationship between task-based and self-reported attention control measures in two studies. In Study 1 (online), participants completed an anti-saccade task follow by self-reported measures of attention control. Anti-saccade task performance was not associated with self-reported attention control shifting or distractibility. In Study 2 (in-person), we incorporated additional task-based measures of attention control and found results consistent with Study 1 (i.e., no association between self-reported and task-based measures of attention control). Bayes factors provided evidence in support of the null hypothesis, or the absence of a relationship between self-reported and task-based measures of attention control. Factor analyses revealed self-reported and task-based measures of attention control separated into two uncorrelated factors. Taken together, our findings suggest that task-based and self-reported attention control measures may not reflect the same underlying construct, which has implications for study design and research on individual differences in attention control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998459What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.