Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998479›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2026

Assessment of particulate embolic agent distribution comparing two delivery techniques in a porcine model.

Camilo Barragan-Leal, Ziv Haskal, Sebastian Mafeld, Dheeraj K Rajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camilo Barragan-LealJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network / Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Camilo.barraganleal@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-5110
Ziv HaskalDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging/Interventional Radiology. Professor of Radiology. , University of Virginia School of Medicine. , Charlottesville, USA.
Sebastian MafeldJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network / Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Dheeraj K RajanJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network / Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare continuous vs pulsed transarterial embolization techniques with microCT and determine their impact on distal vascular penetration. MATERIAL AND

methodsTransarterial embolization was performed in 7 swine using 75-100-micron microspheres. In each subject, 1 kidney was embolized using continuous injection and contralateral with a pulsed injection technique. Histological analysis validated MicroCT findings (50-100 pixels, postprocedural quantification) in 2 subjects (4 kidneys), after which MicroCT alone was used for outcome assessments.

resultsMicroCT imaging demonstrated similar outcomes to histology. Larger number of particles delivered with continuous vs pulsed technique (6806 vs 6174 particles into 223 ml vs 168 ml renal volume respectively). Percentage of the embolized renal cortex at 50 pixels was 1.1% for the continuous technique (0.1 - 2.3%) vs 0.7% pulsed (0.5 - 1.1%) (p = 0.3). Embolized renal cortex at 100 pixels was 2.9% continuous (1.3 - 4.2%) vs 2.3% pulsed (1.3 - 3.2%) (p = 0.3). Average kidney volume in both groups was 78.1 ml (r, 49-138) and 81 ml (r, 46-111), respectively. A slightly larger amount of embolic was delivered using the continuous vs pulsed: 14 ml (r, 12-20) vs 13.1 ml (r, 8-22). Mean embolic/kidney volume ratio was 0.20 for continuous vs 0.16 for pulsed (25% difference, p = 0.2).

conclusionContinuous embolization technique resulted in a larger absolute concentration of embolic particles within the distal renal cortex and overall volume compared to the pulsed technique, though the difference was not statistically significant. Our findings suggest embolic delivery technique for particle embolics may influence amount and efficacy of distal embolization.

Indexed as

Blood vesselEmbolizationHistologyInterventional RadiologyMicroCT

Identifiers

PMID41998479
PMCPMC13090457

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.