ArticleBMC health services research2026
Designing and validating Pharmacy Ergonomics Assessment Checklist (PEAC): an exploratory mixed-method study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAddressing ergonomic issues in pharmacies is of particular importance as a vital component of the pharmaceutical service chain in the healthcare delivery system in every country. This study developed and validated a comprehensive checklist for the assessment of the ergonomic conditions of pharmacies.
methodsThis study employed an exploratory sequential mixed‑methods design. In the qualitative phase, focus group discussions with pharmacy staff and food and drug inspectors, combined with an extensive literature review were used to identify relevant ergonomic items. The identified items were then refined and validated through face and content validity. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test‑retest stability to confirm repeatability in different situations. Ultimately, item weights were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to enable scoring and decision‑making.
resultsContent analysis revealed 23 critical items categorized into three domains: physical, cognitive, and organizational ergonomics. The validation process was characterized robust psychometric properties, including consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-observer reliability, and overall stability, all exceeding the acceptable threshold of 0.7. The assessment ranges for the physical, cognitive and organizational ergonomics dimensions of the PEAC were defined as categorical classes.
conclusionsThe findings demonstrated that the PEAC is a reliable tool to conduct comprehensive assessment of the ergonomic practices within pharmacies. Moreover, the designed checklist helps not only in pinpointing the main ergonomic issues but also act as a working base regarding specific interventions to improve workplace health and safety. By implementing the PEAC, pharmacy managers can foster a safer work environment that leads to improved employee well-being and productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.