ArticleBMC public health2026
A narrower access gap, yet persistent divides: the digital inequality among China's urban-rural older adults.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs societies digitize, aging populations face emerging forms of digital inequality, manifesting distinct spatial disparities in rapidly developing contexts.
methodsThis study systematically examines the urban-rural digital divide among China’s older adults through a three-tier framework (access-usage-outcome), utilizing the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) data and employing comparative analysis, Probit, Oporbit and OLS regression.
resultsIt reveals a three-dimensional digital divide with distinct characteristics at each level. First, a comparison of the two cross-sectional surveys reveals that the urban-rural gap in access was substantially smaller in 2021 than in 2017. Second, the urban-rural gap in general internet usage was narrower in 2021 than in 2017. However, structural inequalities persist between urban and rural areas in terms of usage frequency. Most significantly, the pattern of the association between internet use and health differs substantially between urban and rural older adults in both survey years. Specifically, the association between frequency of internet use and health among rural older adults differs in timing and nature from that among their urban counterparts.
conclusionsThese findings confirm the three-stage diffusion mechanism of digital technology: a smaller access gap does not automatically translate into equal usage or equitable outcomes. They underscore the importance of evidence-based, multi-level digital inclusion policies that integrate long-term planning with targeted interventions to promote equitable participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.