ArticleRespiratory research2026
A cross-sectional analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data to determine if tobacco and cannabis methods of administration are likely to be consistent across products.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cannabis and tobacco co-use has increased over time, but research evaluating co-use risks rarely considers different cannabis or tobacco use modalities (e.g., smoking, vaping). Data were analyzed from 4,071 participants from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, a nationally representative survey of United States adults, who endorsed past 30-day cannabis use and current cigarette smoking and/or vaping. A weighted multinomial logistic regression was used to determine if current tobacco use (cigarettes, vaping, or dual use; independent variable) was associated with cannabis use modality (only smoking, only vaping, or smoking and vaping cannabis; dependent variable), controlling for race, sex, and education level. Compared to individuals who smoked cigarettes, those vaping (odds ratio [OR] = 7.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.03, 12.58) or dual using (OR = 5.69, 95% CI: 2.66, 12.19) tobacco were more likely to vape cannabis than smoke cannabis. Additionally, compared to those who smoked cigarettes, individuals vaping (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 2.73, 5.19) or dual using (OR = 4.62, 95% CI: 3.21, 6.64) tobacco were more likely to smoke and vape cannabis than exclusively smoke cannabis, but were less likely to smoke and vape cannabis than exclusively vape cannabis (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.97). Race and education level differences were also found. Results indicated adults co-using tobacco and cannabis may use the same consumption modality for both products (e.g., those smoking tobacco also smoke cannabis, while those vaping tobacco also vape cannabis), which has important implications for health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.